I mean, there's the 2022 study mentioned earlier. So, the question is: is that amount of HIIT doable/enjoyable to you?īecause unfortunately, there's research suggesting that it might not be.

If you were to do 5 sessions of HIIT weekly, you’d need to spend 15 minutes per session.Īnd, at the risk of stating the obvious, the fewer sessions you do weekly, the more time you’d have to spend per session (e.g., 3 sessions of 25-min HIIT 😮‍💨). 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week. An equivalent mix of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity.75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity weekly, or.150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity weekly, or.Just look at the official exercise recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when it comes to cardio they recommend that adults should get at least: Your browser does not support the video tag.

Of course, it will, but if you thought you could see massive improvements in 5 minutes a day, you'd need to bring your expectations way down. This isn’t to say that HIIT won't result in cardiometabolic/calorie-burning/athletic performance benefits. HIIT is more pleasant and enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exerciseįalse, false, and false.HIIT doubles endurance performance only after 15 minutes of training over 2 weeks.HIIT lowers the risk of mortality more than moderate-intensity continuous exercise.They also showed that the following were nothing but wishful thinking: Oh, and as mentioned earlier, that wasn't the only claim the researchers debunked in the whole HIIT vs. 💩 Misleading claims, to be specific, several of the assertions about the benefits of HIIT included within the studies diverge from the original evidenceīottom line? Likely, 1 minute of HIIT won't give you the same cardiometabolic/calorie-burning/athletic benefits as 1 hour of LISS/MISS. ❌ Statistical problems that significantly increase the risk of type 1 (false positive) and type 2 (false negative) error

Low intensity steady state